Sunday, May 4, 2008

Highway Toll Lanes for L.A.

Good op-ed in the Los Angeles times yesterday on the trial plan approved by the Metro board here in L.A. to convert carpool lanes into toll lanes. I totally support this plan.

We currently finance transportation infrastructure primarily through gasoline taxes, as cars become more fuel efficient we will be losing needed revenue for infrastructure development. So we need to raise more revenue for transportation infrastructure. I am completely against increasing the sales tax to finance transportation infrastructure (there will probably be a 1/2 cent sales tax increase proposal on the November County of L.A. ballot -- VOTE NO!). Not only are sales taxes incredibly regressive, we should be getting money for transportation projects from the users themselves.

Some of the arguments against highway toll lanes and my response:

1. Freeways should be free.
  • Freeways are not free, we pay for the lack of infrastructure with the opportunity cost of our time as we sit in traffic.
2. The lanes will be only for the rich, "Lexus Lanes"
  • This one is real bizarre. The people who will be most inclined to use the toll lanes are one's who value their time the most. Think about a plumber. Paying say $20 (at most) to save up to an hour of their day in traffic they could probably fit two more service calls into their daily routine. A service call is at least $100 each.
  • So the plumber makes $180 more each day. That is $900 a week in additional revenue that is possible with these toll lanes. That is real money to the plumber.
This proposal is a true win-win. We gain the revenue needed to develop a better transportation infrastructure and we allow entrepreneurs to improve our economy.

1 comment:

Daniel Freedman said...

I disagree. Freeways were built and paid for by everyone, and people have come to rely on them as being a free and open resources... it would be unfair to those who have already paid heavily to build and maintain them, to repaint one of the lanes and make it exclusive for those who can pay more. Additionally, it would be unfair to those who have relied on them for the past 50 years. It's just not right, we do not need toll lanes, we need mass transit. If the freeways are too slow, then people will take transit if there is an option. (have we had this discussion before? I'm having deja vue.) My final point.. Freeways were built to be free! And development patterns have been developed around this assumption... it would be wrong to change this fact. We do not need a "first class" section of the freeway.